For a company so revered by business schools as the example of efficient capitalism and the envy of top companies in the Fortune 500 why does it seem like Wal-Mart emphasizes loyalty and integrity in such a double-standard. Historically, Sam Walton's vision was strategically focused on rural areas to provide everyday low prices ... but at what costs? The former top executives live by Sam Walton's strategy and continue to drive down costs to provide proper living prices for these areas.But has Sam Walton's strategy stood the test of time? Should Wal-Mart continue to operate in the same fashion that he set, or is it time to adjust it's focus towards better corporate social responsibilities in 2009? Take a look at CNBC's in-depth focus on Wal-Mart's business ... do you agree with it's costs and benefits?
0 comments:
Post a Comment